What irks me in particular about the iphone is the sheer number of luddites out there who say it’s revolutionary. It’s not. Everything from the touchscreen to the UI to the idea of third party apps on a phone has all been done before. If the iphone had come out in 1999 I would have said wow but these days it compares to some of its predecessors like a cheap chinese knockoff does to an iphone itself.
So a history lesson is in order. Read on for a brief history of the (touchscreen) smart phone
In the beginning
It all began back in the early 80’s when Casio not content with making cheap calculator watches decided to release a calculator that also stored names, phone numbers and addresses. The first electronic organiser. It’s also when the controversy began as other companies such as Psion have laid claim to being the first to produce a PDA or electronic organiser as they were known in the day.
The first PDAs
Apple themselves deserve a big pat on the back when it comes to the development of the PDA. The Apple Newton was launched in 1994 and was definitely a device ahead of its time. Some might say it even sparked the PDA revolution. However, with weak sales and Apple facing bankruptcy Steve Jobs was called back to save the company, promptly cancelling the Newton.
Palm was the company that made the PDA a commercial success with the launch of its Palm Pilot in 1996. They dominated the market for close to a decade even with the likes of Microsoft entering it.
The smart phone
A smart phone is essentially a PDA mashed with a mobile phone. Who exactly made the first smart phone just like who made the first PDA is a point of contention. Suffice to say it wasn’t Apple. Nokia certainly made the first widely available and (somewhat) affordable smart phone the Nokia Communicator back in 1996. You could probably say that the Visor Phone – an addon for the Palm Pilot was the grand daddy of the iphone. However it was the short lived Nokia 7710 which truly launched the current generation of large touchscreen, multimedia smartphones. The market that Apple leads today.
This phone although long made a dinosaur in the technology department stil holds its ground against the iphone and has many features that iphone owners are still waiting for … five years later.
Where Apple did innovate was in the distribution of applications. Before the iphone you had to buy or download your applications from the software developers direct. Or from aggregators. They were often priced at or just below the equivalent desktop application. People just didn’t want to pay the price and as such there was little motivation to develop applications. Most people made use of what came with their phone.
Next time someone spouts on about how revolutionary their iphone is put them in their place. It’s just another smart phone in a long line of phones.
Tweet This
Digg This Post
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble This Post
Related posts:



Word!
I am still struggling to understand the appeal of the iPhOnE…is it all one big marketing experiment or are we just sucked in by the ‘i’ in front of every Apple product.
When will Apple just print ads with the text: iWant ???
Agreed. To your typical backwater american the iphone prolly looked good. The rest of the world though enjoyed most of the features that the iphone gave our friends in the USA long long ago. I kind of feel sorry for them. The country that claims to be a technological powerhouse has long had to deal with a terrible mobile phone experience.
[...] etc. Apple really don’t mind this, in fact they want you to think you they are cutting edge, even if they are not. When MMS and copy and paste finally came to the iphone many people were convinced Apple had [...]
I love products with touch screen because that is innovative and it is nice to work with a touch screen. But I don´t find a good notebook with good hardware. That´s terrible.